tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post3448020408089163604..comments2024-03-28T14:28:50.226+02:00Comments on Image Sensors World: Video Stabilization and Rolling Shutter Artifacts Removal on YoutubeVladimir Koifmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01800020176563544699noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-26286348213135017592016-03-22T03:10:40.110+02:002016-03-22T03:10:40.110+02:00I agree. Rolling shutter is not characterized as c...I agree. Rolling shutter is not characterized as camera shakiness.Mikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09456884689908680100noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-64337161443175173062013-12-23T15:34:03.296+02:002013-12-23T15:34:03.296+02:00BULL$HIT! Youtube stabilization does NOT remove r...BULL$HIT! Youtube stabilization does NOT remove rolling shutter in the slightest. There R some offline softwares that will, but whether U-Boob claims it does or not, the RESULT is it does NOT. I have uploaded many videos with massive Jell-O & it does NOTHING 2 fix that, while offline tools DO! 4 example, MuVee Turbo Stabilizer worx AWESOME 4 getting rid of ALL Jell-O. However, it does not remove shakies as well as U-Boob. Google should steal the de-Jell-O portion of that program, & add it 2 their already superior 'shakies' remover. THEN Google will have something. So far their Jell-O removal does NOT EXIST. It is a LIE that they do it. IT does NOTHING 2 fix Jell-O yet.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-76256550401528308432012-05-16T12:20:59.919+03:002012-05-16T12:20:59.919+03:00Without having read the paper; my guess is that on...Without having read the paper; my guess is that only rolling shutter artifacts due to camera motion (jello effect) will be removed. Removing artifacts due to moving objects in the scene would be much farther into the realm of impossibility.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-57780940983232507672012-05-08T14:25:12.118+03:002012-05-08T14:25:12.118+03:00I agree with the previous post. I didn't see a...I agree with the previous post. I didn't see any real rolling shutter artifacts in the "before" images. Let see some fast moving cars or spinning objects.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-63140372362475797962012-05-08T05:00:03.260+03:002012-05-08T05:00:03.260+03:00let's see some rotating fan bladeslet's see some rotating fan bladesAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-67503523349773350722012-05-07T18:06:17.253+03:002012-05-07T18:06:17.253+03:00You've missed the point. While this is also pe...You've missed the point. While this is also performing shake reduction (stabilization), it's also removing rolling shutter artifacts - the so-called jello cam effect.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-86187195829985816632012-05-07T00:21:02.471+03:002012-05-07T00:21:02.471+03:00Loss of FOV obviously means it's calculating m...Loss of FOV obviously means it's calculating motion vectors based on frame-to-frame difference. The cropped FOV is used to then move the displayed frame box to oppose the direction of motion to give the illusion of a stabilized image. <br /><br />There are smartphones on the market today which employ such a shake-reduction method during video recording.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-35459300693173097042012-05-06T22:40:36.372+03:002012-05-06T22:40:36.372+03:00What is the computation complexity needed for this...What is the computation complexity needed for this correction ?<br /><br />Thanks !<br /><br />-yang niAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com