tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post1002406398560852767..comments2024-03-28T15:26:27.432+02:00Comments on Image Sensors World: Teledyne e2v Wins Bronze Innovators Award at Vision Systems Design 2017Vladimir Koifmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01800020176563544699noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-35553852933431603812017-04-11T16:32:31.058+03:002017-04-11T16:32:31.058+03:00Due to some restrictions I can't tell you deta...Due to some restrictions I can't tell you details. The CMOSIS has a official 1:50.000 pls. Working in voltage domain. The Emerald has a low noise, it has to be charge domain. If you looked at the vision show presentation it is a FSI sensor. To shield the storage node is the important thing. And if you take the shrinked pixel into account, you can imaging, that 1:10.000 maybe is a number. Or should the goal for them.<br />For ITS applications for example: With QE of 65% and 7k FW, I assume around 25µs exposure for 100k illumination and F1.4. PLS of 1:1000 is useless then. 1:10.000 minimum to prevent ghost effects. We will see in a few month, they announced AS shortly.Dana Diezemannhttp://www.ids-imaging.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-2581919119211023822017-04-11T15:54:25.441+03:002017-04-11T15:54:25.441+03:00One major spec missing: shutter efficiency. While ...One major spec missing: shutter efficiency. While we know that of the cmv, how much is that of emerald?!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-21062986986238734882017-04-11T14:33:07.764+03:002017-04-11T14:33:07.764+03:00The Emerald 16M is a great sensor to replace a CMV...The Emerald 16M is a great sensor to replace a CMV4000.<br />2.8µm pixelsize is near half ot the large 5.5µm CMOSIS pixel. 4k x 4k in 1" the result. Great for inspection and mic.<br />If you compare the Teledyne e2v datasheet values to CMOSIS EMVA1288 values:<br />Dynamic: 63dB - 55dB<br />Fullwell: 7k - 8.5k<br />readout noise: 5e/2.5e - 15e<br />SNR max: 38dB - 39dBDana Diezemannhttp://www.ids-imaging.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-27133568561475762982017-04-06T12:25:00.698+03:002017-04-06T12:25:00.698+03:0010X less compared to CMOSIS?10X less compared to CMOSIS?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-78097930343301719052017-04-05T13:39:40.405+03:002017-04-05T13:39:40.405+03:00well... the drawback of the Emerald is: its not ye...well... the drawback of the Emerald is: its not yet available ;-) Lets see when we can test first samplesAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com