tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post6972884367359366927..comments2024-03-28T17:41:43.970+02:00Comments on Image Sensors World: Invisage Announces Release of Short Film Shot By its QuantumCinema SensorVladimir Koifmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01800020176563544699noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-14270369998012721382015-10-27T02:02:03.034+02:002015-10-27T02:02:03.034+02:00Around 2:55 it looks like their "conventional...Around 2:55 it looks like their "conventional CMOS" sensor was an iPhone6-class camera. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-42091402674982864232015-10-27T00:01:29.262+02:002015-10-27T00:01:29.262+02:00What is with grass on all QuantumFilm flicks? Poor...What is with grass on all QuantumFilm flicks? Poor global shutter efficiency, leakage, lag, or something else?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-76117358495771189782015-10-26T16:03:03.383+02:002015-10-26T16:03:03.383+02:00As it is the Kodak seems to outperform quantum fil...As it is the Kodak seems to outperform quantum film. In fact my reaction to the samples was "Damn film looks great". No arriflex comparisions here.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-21281769517402675062015-10-26T15:23:54.835+02:002015-10-26T15:23:54.835+02:00Well the behind the scene's footage on the fac...Well the behind the scene's footage on the facebook page actually shows a small phone sized device attached to the big camera rigs so its quite a possibility. That and the fact that I doubt they've made anything larger that isn't part of some prototype at present. So there is some hope. Is suspect there will be a hidden issue with this which will come to light (pun intended) in the first consumer device (if any). Most likely it will break down over time due to exposure to UV or other light.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-22493506163007230172015-10-26T03:28:46.194+02:002015-10-26T03:28:46.194+02:00global shutter or rolling shutter may dominate ima...global shutter or rolling shutter may dominate image quality. <br /><br />Does any one knows more detail ??Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-91689182414810197352015-10-25T21:46:47.634+02:002015-10-25T21:46:47.634+02:00Any one knows if the image is digitally corrected ...Any one knows if the image is digitally corrected before display, for example to correct the non-uniformity propice to such device?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-15418133485159312962015-10-25T20:29:57.067+02:002015-10-25T20:29:57.067+02:00They should have used Fuji-film, instead of Kodak ...They should have used Fuji-film, instead of Kodak stock. It has a significantly higher DR than Kodak stock. But it might have matched or outperformed the Quantum BS...solarskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01221745107335250139noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-55634013933457249632015-10-25T19:19:58.668+02:002015-10-25T19:19:58.668+02:00It's very interesting. The image quality has a...It's very interesting. The image quality has a lot to be desired though. Overall the clip looks soft, while the highlight is preserved but it looks flat, as if from a partially graded log file. Is it 8bit color? <br />Having a working global shutter is definitely a major step fwd. bostonchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02213116601754091217noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-82994469837176332962015-10-25T16:59:43.392+02:002015-10-25T16:59:43.392+02:00it's good to see the real images from their te...it's good to see the real images from their technology! But for mobile market, it's maybe too late now. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19092890.post-71160578592465716222015-10-25T15:45:56.861+02:002015-10-25T15:45:56.861+02:00So cheesy it hurts! First of all... they say silli...So cheesy it hurts! First of all... they say sillicon and show a side by side comparison with an uknown horrible looking thing, which looks like the worst sensor chip in the worst no-name knockoff chinese mobile phone. <br /><br />But... if the movie was shot on their quantum sensor which has the typical size of a smarpthone sensor then I'm really impressed.. but if it was your typical 2/3" chip or god forbid M3/4 or APS-C (even 8mm size) then i'm only slightly amused while slightly bored<br /><br />Does anyone think it might have been a mobile phone size chip due to the weird softness of the lens? Or 8mm or 16mm lens?Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16413848373578447966noreply@blogger.com