Lists

Monday, February 28, 2011

ISSCC 2011 Review, Part 5

Albert Theuwissen concludes his series of ISSCC reviews. The last part talks about the following presentations:

Albert Wang (Cornell University) "An Angle Sensitive CMOS imager for single-sensor 3D photography"

Robert Johansson (Aptina) "A 1/13-inch 30fps VGA SoC CMOS image sensor with shared reset and transfer gate pixel control"

Sangjoo Lee (Samsung) "A 1/2.33-inch 14.6M 1.4 um pixel backside illuminated CMOS imager sensor with floating diffusion boosting"

Dan Pates (Aptina) "An APS-C format 14b digital CMOS image sensor with a dynamic response pixel"

Takayuki Toyama (Sony) "A 17.7 Mpixel 120 fps CMOS image sensor with 34.8 Gb/s readout" - this is probably the same sensor that Sony talked about last week, so I'll quote Albert's impressions from the presentation:

"The sensor reported was on based on the “classical” Sony concept of column parallel ADCs based on up-down counters. But because of the extremely high bitrate of the overall chip, the 14 counters in the column are split into two parts:

  • The lower 5 bit counters, which are driven with 248 columns in parallel, in such a way that the columns do not contain the real counters, but contain memory cells,
  • The upper 9 bit counters, which are based on real counters as before.

This hybrid construction allows to maintain the high accuracy of 14 bits with the extremely high speed of 34.8 Gb/s overall. The device runs at 120 fps at 12 bits and 60 fps at 14 bits. The chip is realized in 90 nm technology, 1P4M and consumes a total power of 3W at 120 fps.
"

4 comments:

  1. Thanks for your work!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sounds like this 17.7mp camera might be Sony's new 6K cinema camera (that targets 4K resolution).

    http://image-sensors-world.blogspot.com/2010/12/sony-cinealta-moves-beyond-bayer.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. My apologies for getting lost in translation, but do the "lower 5 bit counters" keep track of the 5 least-significant bits or the 5 most-significant bits?

    ReplyDelete
  4. On the sony sensor:
    17.7 Mpixels * 120 fps * 12 bit = 25.5 Gbps.

    So where does the 34.8 Gb/s come from? Is there a large overhead in the data output?

    ReplyDelete

All comments are moderated to avoid spam and personal attacks.