It looks like they are pushing the smaller pixel racing by using more advanced node for the upper die. But, I'm not convinced that lens makers like Largan would also assist Samsung's stance. Obviously, it depends on how much Samsung CIS can sell their product with the very small pixel product. High R&D expense, high return. This is a common sense of any kind of industry.
28 nm process for pixe die? Propaganda!
ReplyDelete28nm is logic die for stack
ReplyDeleteno, it is pixel silicon, not logic silicon
DeleteIt looks like they are pushing the smaller pixel racing by using more advanced node for the upper die. But, I'm not convinced that lens makers like Largan would also assist Samsung's stance. Obviously, it depends on how much Samsung CIS can sell their product with the very small pixel product. High R&D expense, high return. This is a common sense of any kind of industry.
ReplyDelete