Update: The links and the data have been removed at ON Semi request. It is not supposed to be publicly available.
The original post follows:
The 1/2-inch AR0820 features:
- 2.1 µm Automotive Grade BSI Pixel with DR−Pix Technology
- On−Sensor HDR Reconstruct with Flexible Exposure Ratio Control
- Full Resolution Video Capture of 3840 x 2160 at up to 40 fps in 3−exposure HDR and 30 fps in 4−exposure HDR
- Line interleaved T1/T2/T3/T4 output
- Sensor Fault Detection for ASIL−B Compliance Support
- 2 x 2 In−pixel Binning Mode and Color Binning Mode
- Data Interface: 1.8 Gbps/Lane, 4−lane MIPI CSI−2
- Selectable Automatic or User Controlled Black Level Control
- Frame to Frame Switching Among up to 4 Contexts to Enable Multi−function Systems
- Multi−Camera Synchronization Support
- Multiple CFA Options including RGB, and RCCC, RCCB
What a relief !!
ReplyDeleteHi Albert,
Deletejust fyi - it seems more vendors start adding EMVA1288 datasheets. For example I just recently learned that e2v Emerald 67M comes with a EMVA1288 standard datasheet
I'm very happy to see pixel MTF data, but there's a trade-off between peak QE and pixel MTF. I'd like to see a study of object detectability/recognition versus QE/MTF trade-offs.
ReplyDeleteTraditionally, sensor companies have fixated on QE specs while paying less attention to MTF. This doesn't guarantee that they at the optimum spot for object detection.
For object detectability versus QE/MTF study, please check the paper "Comparison of Detectability Index and Contrast Detection Probability", equation #6 and #20-32 express the relations between detectability vs. QE&MTF.
DeleteAh, yes! I knew I'd seen a paper related to this topic somewhere. I really should have remembered it was by Robin.
DeleteIndeed, props for publishing! May they publish more technical content in the future.
ReplyDelete