I'd like to know what their proposal for optics for a vis + LWIR camera is. Germanium and germanium-alternative lenses for LWIR are opaque in the visible range.
Are there some, lens-free applications (contact imaging?) that could use vis + LWIR capability without optics?
a few days back there was a post about a quite interesting paper about this (among other) new approaches: http://image-sensors-world.blogspot.com/2019/04/graphene-image-sensors-overview.html?m=1
will be interesting to learn about their price point. one major claim of the 'alternative' approches to SWIR sensors like this graphene or for example CQD is a huge advantage in price vs. for example InGaAs. up to now i am not aware of an product that can fullfil such claim. does anybody know about some sensoric I can buy right now or in a year that does fullfil the claim?
I'd like to know what their proposal for optics for a vis + LWIR camera is. Germanium and germanium-alternative lenses for LWIR are opaque in the visible range.
ReplyDeleteAre there some, lens-free applications (contact imaging?) that could use vis + LWIR capability without optics?
There seems to be a single LWIR pixel. Or at best the LWIR pixel array is next to the vis/swir array.
DeleteStrange.
a few days back there was a post about a quite interesting paper about this (among other) new approaches: http://image-sensors-world.blogspot.com/2019/04/graphene-image-sensors-overview.html?m=1
ReplyDeletewill be interesting to learn about their price point. one major claim of the 'alternative' approches to SWIR sensors like this graphene or for example CQD is a huge advantage in price vs. for example InGaAs. up to now i am not aware of an product that can fullfil such claim. does anybody know about some sensoric I can buy right now or in a year that does fullfil the claim?
ReplyDelete